Stories, Struggles, and Science: Narrative Inquiry as a Methodology for Understanding Impostor Phenomenon
Simone S. Atkinson
The Atkinson Institute · theatkinsoninstitute.org
Peer-Informed Article · 2025
Topics: Impostorism · Narrative Inquiry · Lived Experience · Qualitative Research · Self-Doubt
Suggested Citation (APA):
Atkinson, S. S. (2025). Stories, struggles, and science: Narrative inquiry as a methodology for understanding impostor phenomenon.
The Atkinson Institute. https://theatkinsoninstitute.org/research/stories-struggles-science
Abstract
The scientific literature on impostor phenomenon is rich with quantitative data: prevalence rates, factor analyses of measurement instruments, correlational studies linking impostorism to anxiety, perfectionism, and academic performance. What this literature has been comparatively slow to engage is the question of what it actually feels like to live inside the impostor cycle, and why that phenomenological dimension matters for research and intervention. This article argues for narrative inquiry as an essential complement to quantitative impostor phenomenon research. Drawing on Clandinin and Connelly's (2000) foundational framework for narrative inquiry, the phenomenological tradition in psychology (Giorgi, 2009), and the specific literature on personal narrative and identity construction (McAdams, 1993), it proposes that first-person accounts of impostorism are not merely illustrative of findings produced by other methods. They are a distinct category of evidence with unique evidentiary value. The article further examines three recurring narrative themes in impostor phenomenon accounts, the silence of success, the weight of the first-generation experience, and the identity disruption of life transition, and demonstrates how each reveals dimensions of impostorism that quantitative instruments do not fully capture.
Keywords: impostor phenomenon, narrative inquiry, lived experience, qualitative research, identity, first-generation, life transition, phenomenology
Introduction
When Clance and Imes published their foundational study of the impostor phenomenon in 1978, their methodology was explicitly clinical and narrative. They drew on observations of more than 150 highly successful women in psychotherapy and academic settings, listening carefully to how these women described their internal experience of achievement and doubt. The impostor phenomenon was not extracted from a survey instrument. It was heard in the specific language their participants used: the fear of being found out, the attribution of success to luck, the sense of having fooled everyone in the room.In the decades that followed, impostorism research became increasingly quantitative. The development of the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS) in 1985 enabled large-sample studies, cross-population comparisons, and statistical modeling of predictors and outcomes. This quantitative turn produced significant knowledge. It also produced a particular kind of blind spot. When the primary unit of analysis is a scale score, the texture of the lived experience, the specific narrative logic by which an individual constructs and sustains a self-perception of fraudulence, becomes difficult to see.This article argues that recovering the narrative dimension of impostor phenomenon research is not a retreat from rigor. It is an expansion of it. Personal stories are not merely data decoration. Under appropriate methodological conditions, they are primary evidence about psychological phenomena that other methods cannot fully access.
2. Narrative Inquiry as a Research Methodology
Narrative inquiry, as systematized by Clandinin and Connelly (2000), treats human experience as fundamentally storied. People do not simply have experiences. They organize, interpret, and communicate experiences in narrative form, with temporal structure, causal logic, and evaluative framing. This means that the stories individuals tell about their experiences are not reflections of an underlying psychological reality that exists independently of language. They are constitutive of that reality. The story is not a report on the experience. It is part of the experience itself.For impostor phenomenon research, this has specific implications. The impostor cycle, as Clance and Imes (1978) described it, is itself a narrative structure. It has a beginning (the anticipation of a challenge), a middle (the overwork, the anxiety, the performance), and an end that resets rather than resolves (the external success that fails to update internal self-assessment). Individuals who experience chronic impostorism are, in a meaningful sense, living inside a repeating story, one whose plot logic prevents the integration of disconfirming evidence.
McAdams (1993) argued that identity itself is fundamentally a personal narrative, a story the self tells about the self, with themes, characters, turning points, and a governing sense of what the story means. Impostorism, on this account, is a narrative problem as much as a psychological one. The individual has internalized a story in which their competence is contingent, their recognition is undeserved, and their exposure is imminent. Changing that story is not accomplished by providing better data. It requires narrative intervention: the construction of a different, more accurate, and more sustaining account of one's own life.
3. Three Recurring Narrative Themes in Impostor Phenomenon Accounts
Analysis of first-person impostor phenomenon accounts across clinical, academic, and community contexts reveals several recurring thematic structures. Three are examined here in detail because each illuminates a dimension of impostorism that quantitative research has not fully captured.
3.1 The Silence of Success
A striking and consistent feature of impostor phenomenon narratives is what might be called the silence of success: the experience in which achievement produces not satisfaction or pride but an intensification of anxiety and a retreat into silence. Individuals describe a pattern in which public recognition, rather than confirming competence, triggers an acute awareness of the gap between how they are perceived and how they perceive themselves. The promotion, the award, the public praise becomes not a resolution of doubt but its amplification.
This narrative theme points to something that scale-based research captures only partially. The CIPS measures the frequency and intensity of impostor feelings, but it does not capture the specific triggering function of success in the impostor cycle. Qualitative accounts make clear that for many individuals, achievement is not a neutral event that coexists with impostorism. It is an active trigger that intensifies it. This has direct intervention implications: approaches that rely on helping individuals accumulate and acknowledge achievements may, for this population, be inadvertently reinforcing the cycle rather than interrupting it.
3.2 The First-Generation Experience
A second recurring theme in impostor phenomenon narratives involves the specific experience of being the first in one's family to enter a professional, academic, or institutional context. First-generation college students, first-generation professionals, and individuals who have crossed significant class, cultural, or social boundaries in their careers describe a distinctive form of impostorism that is less about doubting individual competence and more about doubting legitimate belonging.
Cokley et al. (2013) identified ethnicity and minority status as significant moderators of impostor phenomenon intensity, with minority students reporting higher levels of impostorism and greater psychological distress associated with it. But the narrative dimension of this experience adds specificity that the statistical finding does not. First-generation individuals frequently describe not a fear that they are not smart enough, but a fear that they are not the right kind of person for the room they have entered, that their way of speaking, their cultural references, their family background, mark them as categorically out of place regardless of their demonstrated ability.
This is a qualitatively different experience from the classic impostor cycle, and it points toward different interventions. Attribution restructuring, teaching individuals to attribute success to internal rather than external causes, addresses competence-based impostorism but may miss the belonging-based impostorism that characterizes much of the first-generation experience. Narrative approaches that explicitly address the legitimacy of one's presence, rather than merely the adequacy of one's performance, are more directly targeted to this population.
3.3 Impostorism in Life Transition
A third recurring narrative theme involves the intensification of impostorism during major life transitions: career changes, geographic relocations, role shifts, and identity reconstructions of the kind that accompany significant life events. Transition narratives reveal that impostorism is not a stable trait but a context-sensitive response that is particularly acute when the social and institutional structures that normally anchor identity are disrupted or removed.This is consistent with Burke and Stets's (2009) identity theory, which holds that identity is maintained through ongoing feedback loops between self-perception and social role. When roles change, the feedback loops are disrupted, and the self must reconstruct its evaluative anchor points. Individuals in transition lack the accumulated social evidence that stable environments provide, making them more dependent on internal self-assessment at precisely the moment when that internal self-assessment is most destabilized.
Military spouses navigating repeated relocations, professionals re-entering the workforce after caregiving leave, and individuals rebuilding identity after significant loss all demonstrate this transition-intensified pattern in their narrative accounts. Their stories share a common structure: the loss of a context in which competence was legible and recognized, the entry into a new context in which it must be reestablished from the beginning, and the impostor experience of that gap as evidence of fundamental inadequacy rather than as a normal feature of transition.
4. What Narrative Evidence Adds to the Science
The three themes examined above share a common implication for impostor phenomenon research and intervention. They each reveal a dimension of impostorism that aggregate data obscures. Scale scores can tell us how frequently an individual experiences impostor feelings and how intensely. They cannot tell us what triggers those feelings, what narrative logic sustains them, or what kind of intervention addresses the specific structure of a given individual's impostor experience.Giorgi's (2009) phenomenological method offers one rigorous framework for extracting generalizable insights from first-person narrative accounts. By bracketing the researcher's prior assumptions and attending closely to the specific language and structure of participants' descriptions, phenomenological analysis identifies the essential features of an experience as it is lived, rather than as it is measured. Applied to impostor phenomenon research, this approach has the potential to reveal the specific conditions under which impostorism is triggered, the precise cognitive and emotional moves through which the impostor cycle is maintained, and the narrative turning points at which individuals have successfully interrupted it.This is the methodological contribution The Atkinson Institute's Identity and Resilience Study seeks to make. By collecting structured narrative accounts alongside quantitative measures, the study is designed to produce knowledge about impostorism that neither method could generate alone.
5. Implications for Practice
The narrative framework proposed here has direct implications for how impostorism interventions are designed and delivered. If impostorism is, in part, a narrative problem, then effective intervention must include a narrative component: not merely the provision of coping strategies or the correction of cognitive distortions, but the active construction of a more accurate and sustaining self-narrative.This does not require that all intervention be explicitly therapeutic. Group settings in which individuals share structured accounts of their experiences with impostorism serve a narrative function. They allow individuals to hear their own story reflected in others', which both normalizes the experience and provides narrative models of interruption and recovery. The community function of impostorism intervention is, in part, a storytelling function.
Written reflection practices, including structured journaling that specifically addresses the narrative logic of one's impostor experience, asking not just what happened but what story it confirms and whether that story is accurate, have demonstrated efficacy in related areas of cognitive and emotional processing (Pennebaker & Smyth, 2016). These approaches are low-cost, scalable, and directly targeted at the narrative mechanisms through which impostorism is maintained.
Conclusion
The science of impostor phenomenon is stronger for its quantitative foundations. Prevalence data, factor analyses, and correlational studies have established impostorism as a legitimate and measurable psychological construct with significant consequences for wellbeing, performance, and identity. But the science is incomplete without its narrative dimension.
People do not experience scale scores. They experience the specific, textured, temporally structured reality of living with self-doubt in the context of their particular lives, their particular histories, their particular transitions and losses and achievements. Understanding that experience, on its own terms, with its own evidentiary standing, is not a soft complement to the hard science of impostorism. It is a necessary part of the science itself.
Stories are not illustrations of findings. In the right methodological hands, they are findings.
References
Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. Oxford University Press.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The impostor phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241–247.
Clance, P. R. (1985). The impostor phenomenon: Overcoming the fear that haunts your success. Peachtree Publishers.Cokley, K., McClain, S., Enciso, A., & Martinez, M. (2013). An examination of the impact of minority status stress and impostor feelings on the mental health of diverse ethnic minority college students. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 41(2), 82–95.
Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press.
McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. William Morrow.
Pennebaker, J. W., & Smyth, J. M. (2016). Opening up by writing it down: How expressive writing improves health and eases emotional pain (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Sakulku, J., & Alexander, J. (2011). The impostor phenomenon. International Journal of Behavioral Science, 6(1), 75–97.
© 2025 The Atkinson Institute. This article may be cited for academic and professional purposes with attribution. For permissions, contact admin@theatkinsoninstitute.org